Cases 1 - 10 of 38
BURGESS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13878
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER EDWARD BURGESS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VANHALEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12834
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER EDWARD VANHALEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edwards v. Ashford TRS Santa Clara, LLC
as 4:2023cv04444
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edwards
Defendant:
Ashford TRS Santa Clara, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
COLLINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19947
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER EDWARD COLLINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Braidwood v. Coryer
as 4:2023cv05016
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edward George Braidwood
Defendant:
Michael James Edward Coryer
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
FERRELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22434
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER EDWARD FERRELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KARAM v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14891
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER EDWARD KARAM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EDWARDS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16009
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER EDWARDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCLEMORE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11356
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER EDWARD MCLEMORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38848
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
