Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
TAYLOR v. CONTI et al
as 1:2014cv00288
Petitioner:
SPENCER TAYLOR
Respondent:
JOY FLOWERS CONTI, NORA BARRY FISHER, CIA OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. DEMPSEY et al
as 1:2011cv01696
Plaintiff:
AUDREY CARTER
Defendant:
MARTIN DEMPSEY, STANLEY MCCRYSTAL, KEITH ALAXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. CIA et al
as 1:2010cv00948
Plaintiff:
FARAUD K. MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
CIA, TIM MOORE, GENERAL SERGEANT TO THE CIA IN ILLINOIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. THE PRESIDENT OF THE CIA OF ILLINOIS et al
as 1:2009cv01643
Plaintiff:
FARAUD K. MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
THE PRESIDENT OF THE CIA OF ILLINOIS and NAT LANTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MUHAMMAD v. THE GOVERNOR TO THE CIA OF ILLINOIS et al
as 1:2009cv01046
Plaintiff:
FARAUD K. MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
THE GOVERNOR TO THE CIA OF ILLINOIS, TIM MOORE, GENERAL SERGEANT TO THE CIA IN ILLINOIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICHARDS v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2008cv01253
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN A. RICHARDS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, MICHAEL V. HAYDEN and CIA DOES
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
NEWMAN v. TRAITORS-SADISTS et al
as 1:2008cv00711
Plaintiff:
GREGORY E. NEWMAN
Defendant:
TRAITORS-SADISTS, CBS NEWS, US ARMY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COMP BRASILEIRA CARB, et al v. APPLIED INDUS MATER, et al
as 1:2001cv00646
Plaintiff:
COMPANHIA BRASILEIRA CARBURETO DE CALCIO -- CBCC, COMPANHIA FERROLIGAS MINAS GERAIS-MINASLIGAS, CIA. DE FERROLIGAS DA BAHIA-FERBASA and others
Defendant:
APPLIED INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS CORPORATION, ELKEM METALS COMPANY, INC., ELKEM A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
