Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ferrer & Poirot v. Cincinnati Ins Company
as 21-11046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ferrer & Poirot, GP, Ferrer & Poirot, PC, doing business as Ferrer, Poirot, Wansbrough, Feller, Daniel, Abney and 2603 Oak Lawn, L.P.
Defendant / Appellee:
Cincinnati Insurance Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Donahue v. Darana Hybrid
as 21-30212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua Donahue and Angela Bolton
3Rd Party Defendant:
Cincinnati Insurance Company
Defendant / Appellee:
Makar Installations, Incorporated and Darana Hybrid, Incorporated
Blakely Turner, et al v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
as 20-50548
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL HARRIS, SHAMIYAN WALTON, DAMON BROOKS and others
Intervenor:
CHARLES LEVY
Defendant / Appellee:
CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Anderson v. Midwest Recovery Systems LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01341
Plaintiff:
Connell Anderson
Defendant:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company and Midwest Recovery Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Vasquez v. Vericred Solutions LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00920
Defendant:
Vericred Solutions LLC and The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Cody Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
