Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03472
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02583
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv03597
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01893
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OOMMEN v. CINTAS CORPORATION
as 5:2015cv01984
Plaintiff: THALESSERIL JOHN OOMMEN
Defendant: CINTAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
INSURANCE COMPANY OF GREATER NEW YORK v. CINTAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv02850
Plaintiff: INSURANCE COMPANY OF GREATER NEW YORK
Defendant: CINTAS CORPORATION and SIBRE-DALE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01177
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00945
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
KNISELY et al. v. SHRED - IT USA, INC. et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01193
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, EX REL. DOUGLAS KNISELY and KNISELY SECURITY LLC
Defendant: CINTAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04449
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?