Cases 31 - 40 of 27,374
Frerichs v. City of Spokane Police Department
as 24-2977
Plaintiff:
JARED A FRERICHS
Defendant:
CITY OF SPOKANE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Wilson et al v. CIty of Antioch et al
as 3:2024cv02758
Plaintiff:
Jessie Wilson and Dajon Smith
Defendant:
CIty of Antioch, Devon Christopher Wenger, Eric Allen Rombough and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Dorsett et al v. The City of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
William J. Dorsett and Rogelio Flores
Defendant:
The City of San Diego and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
U.S. News & World Report, L.P. v. Chiu
as 24-2928
Plaintiff:
U.S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT, L.P.
Defendant:
DAVID CHIU, in his Official Capacity as City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco
Coleman v. City of Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, et al.
as 24-2939
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON COLEMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOSEPH LEPORE, CHERYL HOOTEN and others
Berry v. City of San Jose, et al.
as 24-2894
Plaintiff:
BRYANNA BERRY
Defendant:
CITY OF SAN JOSE and LINDSAY PARODI
Sullivan Equity Partners, LLC v. City of Los Angeles
as 24-2893
Plaintiff:
SULLIVAN EQUITY PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a Charter City
Universal Meditech, Inc. et al v. City of Reedley et al
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Universal Meditech, Inc. and David He
Defendant:
City of Reedley, Jeremy Harrison, Jesalyn Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.T. v. City of Sacramento
as 2:2024cv01299
Plaintiff:
A.T.
Defendant:
City of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Billy Gitau v. Dustin Fay et al
as 8:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
Billy Gitau
Defendant:
Dustin Fay, Monte Peters, Martha Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
