Cases 31 - 40 of 6,745
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sessanga v. City of DeSoto et al
as 3:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Charles Sessanga
Defendant:
City of DeSoto and J. Acosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanwyck v. City of Rhome et al
as 4:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Marc Stanwyck
Defendant:
City of Rhome, Eric Debus, Carvan Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Sealey v. Mancias et al
as 5:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Samantha Lee-Ann Sealey
Defendant:
Arturo Mancias, San Antonio Police Department - Headquarters and City of San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valenzuela v. Ghost City Tours of Texas, LLC. et al
as 5:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Valenzuela
Defendant:
Ghost City Tours of Texas, LLC. and Ghost City Tours Holding, LLC.
LIA Network et al v. The City of Kerrville
as 5:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
LIA Network, Liberty In Action, Terri Hall and others
Defendant:
The City of Kerrville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gray v. Hernandez et al
as 5:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Julie Gray
Defendant:
Jesus Hernandez, III, Miguel A. Rodriguez, Jr., City of Laredo Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Neisen v. Nueces County et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Heather Neisen
Defendant:
Nueces County, Corpus Christi Police Department and City of Corpus Christi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palmer v. The City of El Lago
as 4:2024cv01375
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Palmer
Defendant:
The City of El Lago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gregson v. City of San Marcos et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
John Gregson
Defendant:
City of San Marcos, Hays County, Officer John Reeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
