Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Carl Ledford v. Meloday Waldo, et al
as 23-2463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL L. LEDFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
MELODAY WALDO, FORT WAYNE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF FORT WAYNE, INDIANA and others
Boris Mudd v. City of Fort Wayne, et al
as 18-1643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BORIS MUDD
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FORT WAYNE, INDIANA, FORT WAYNE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JASON FUHRMAN and others
Harrie Rembert v. City of Fort Wayne, Indiana, et al
as 17-3206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRIE REMBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FORT WAYNE, INDIANA, CHRISTOPHER HOFFMAN, RYAN TOSLAND and others
Jarren Austin v. John Niblick, et al
as 16-3317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JARREN L. AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN NIBLICK and CITY OF FORT WAYNE, INDIANA
See v. City of Fort Wayne, Indiana
as 1:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Keith See
Defendant:
City of Fort Wayne, Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Estate of Antron Pearson v. City of Fort Wayne, Indiana, et al
as 15-2774
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTATE OF ANTRON PEARSON, by its Personal Representative BARBARA D. PEARSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF FORT WAYNE, INDIANA and JOSHUA FRANCISCY, Officer, in his individual and official capacities
Estate of Antron Pearson v. City of Fort Wayne, Indiana, et al
as 15-2774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF ANTRON PEARSON, by its Personal Representative BARBARA D. PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FORT WAYNE, INDIANA and JOSHUA FRANCISCY, Officer, in his individual and official capacities
Beyer v. Rogers et al
as 1:2015cv00166
Plaintiff:
Babi E Beyer
Defendant:
Mark A Rogers and City of Fort Wayne, Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jarren Austin v. John Niblick, et al
as 15-1957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JARREN L. AUSTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN NIBLICK and CITY OF FORT WAYNE, INDIANA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
