Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NAEH Media Group LLC, et al v. City of Lauderhill, Florida
as 23-11022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAEH MEDIA GROUP LLC and TK ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA
Eric Watkins v. David Session, et al
as 22-14070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC WATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID SESSION, WILLIAM VOGT, DAVLIN SESSION and others
Robinson-Washington v. GILLESPIE et al
as 0:2022cv60958
Plaintiff:
Andramedia Cheryl Robinson-Washington
Defendant:
KENNETH L. GILLESPIE, SHARI AFRICK OLEFSON, KlM THERESA MOLLICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Eric Watkins v. M. Bigwood, et al
as 22-10875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC WATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
M. BIGWOOD, T. YOPPA, #353, SAMUEL RAMOS and others
NAEH Media Group LLC et al v. City of Lauderhill, Florida
as 0:2021cv61270
Plaintiff:
TK Enterprises, Inc. and NAEH Media Group LLC
Defendant:
City of Lauderhill, Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardichon v. City of Lauderhill et al
as 0:2019cv62583
Defendant:
Piman Fest, City of Lauderhill and Juvenia Mackensie
Plaintiff:
Frandy Cardichon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piman Fest et al v. City of Lauderhill
as 0:2019cv62585
Defendant:
City of Lauderhill
Plaintiff:
Juvenia Mackensie, Frandy Cardichon and Piman Fest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cardichon v. City of Lauderhill Florida
as 0:2018cv62214
Defendant:
City of Lauderhill Florida
Plaintiff:
Frandy Cardichon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Watkins v. City of Lauderhill Police, et al
as 18-10773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LAUDERHILL POLICE, JESSIE ELMORE and JOSEPH LAGRASTA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
