Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lemon v. City of Markham, Illinois et al
as 1:2026cv00085
Plaintiff:
Nitisha Lemon
Defendant:
City of Markham, Illinois, Markham Police Department, Patti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKinnis v. City of Markham et al
as 1:2025cv14394
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. McKinnis
Defendant:
City of Markham and John Doe
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ndoole Kibancha v. City Of Markham et al
as 1:2025cv14330
Plaintiff:
Fabrice Joseph Ndoole Kibancha
Defendant:
City Of Markham and Markham Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Samuels v. Byrd et al
as 1:2025cv12660
Plaintiff:
Willie Samuels
Defendant:
Ricky Byrd, Christopher Thunherst, Luis Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
ATM Installer, Inc. v. City of Markham et al
as 1:2025cv10732
Plaintiff:
ATM Installers, Inc.
Defendant:
City Of Markham, Roger Agpawa and Robert Scharnhorst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nutripack, LLC v. City of Markham et al
as 1:2025cv09603
Plaintiff:
Nutripack, LLC
Defendant:
City of Markham, Roger A Agpawa, Brenna Hampton-Hauser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. Toledo et al
as 1:2025cv06410
Plaintiff:
Eric Johnson, Mary Mosley and Demario Lloyd
Defendant:
Officer Toledo, Officer Rangel, Officer Michaels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. City of Markham
as 1:2025cv03569
Plaintiff:
Sanuel Daniel Johnson
Defendant:
City of Markham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Taylor v. City of Markham
as 1:2025cv00070
Defendant:
City of Markham
Plaintiff:
Iesha Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
