Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Lefever v. Ferguson et al
as 2:2012cv00664
Plaintiff:
Alex Lefever
Defendant:
James Ferguson , Ken Ballantine , Bill Hatfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeFever v. Ferguson et al
as 2:2011cv00935
Plaintiff:
Virginia LeFever
Defendant:
James Ferguson, Ken Ballantine, Bill Hatfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ketter v. City of Newark, Ohio et al
as 2:2011cv00734
Plaintiff:
Robert Gregory Ketter
Defendant:
City of Newark, Ohio , Bob Diebold , Judith Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
84 Video/Newsstand, Inc., et al v. Thomas Sartini, et al
as 09-3920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
84 VIDEO/NEWSSTAND, INC., dba 84 Video/Newsstand, VINE STREET NEWS, INC., dba Adult Mart, NU PHILLY VIDEO/NEWS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS SARTINI, in his official capacity as Ashtabula County Prosecutor, ROSS CIRINCIONE, in his official capacity as Law Director of the City of Bedford Heights, DAVID A. LAMBROS, in his official capacity as Law Director of the City of Brookpark and others
Defendant - Intervenor:
THE STATE OF OHIO
84 Video/Newsstand, Inc., et al v. Thomas Sartini, et al
as 08-4559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
84 VIDEO/NEWSSTAND, INC., dba 84 Video/Newsstand, VINE STREET NEWS, INC., dba Adult Mart, NU PHILLY VIDEO/NEWS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS SARTINI, in his official capacity as Ashtabula County Prosecutor, KATHARINE LANG BETTASSO, in her official capacity as Law Director of the City of Bedford Heights, DAVID A. LAMBROS, in his official capacity as Law Director of the City of Brookpark and others
Defendant - Intervenor:
THE STATE OF OHIO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Abdul-Khaliq v. Newark, et al
as 07-3485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMRAN ABDUL-KHALIQ
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NEWARK, ERIC COOK, ARTHUR MINTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
