Cases 21 - 29 of 29
ARCHIE v. PABST BLUE RIBBON et al
as 2:2012cv04697
Plaintiff:
SHAQUAN ARCHIE
Defendant:
PABST BLUE RIBBON, GENERAL SECURITY, THE CITY OF NEWARK, N.J. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DINKINS v. CITY OF NEWARK
as 2:2012cv04481
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DINKINS
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, NEWARK POLICE DEPT., OCCASIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARCHIE v. THE CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2012cv03657
Plaintiff:
SHAQUAN ARCHIE
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEWARK, NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT and A GROUP OF N.P.D OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2012cv00325
Plaintiff:
KWASI SEKOU MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, PATROLMEN A-Z and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOVE v. MATTES, MR. et al
as 2:2011cv06241
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE S. DOVE
Defendant:
VON MATTES, ESSEX COUNTY COURTS, HOMELESS SHELTER-URBAN RENEWAL CORP.-NEWARK, NJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. NY Pol Dept, et al
as 10-1892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMERSON TUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
NY POL DEPT, STEVEN, New York Police Detective, THOMAS, New York Police Det. and others
Emerson Tucker v. NY Pol Dept, et al
as 08-4063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMERSON TUCKER
Defendant:
NY POL DEPT, DEXTER HONORA, New York Police Detective, Badge #2196, STEVEN, New York Police Detective and others
Defendant - Non-Participating:
CHICAGO SUN TIMES NEWSPAPER
STACKHOUSE v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2007cv04403
Plaintiff:
STACK STACKHOUSE
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, COREY BOOKER, NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLEY v. CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2007cv01784
Plaintiff:
TERRELL KELLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT and OTHER DEFENDANT WHEN KNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
