Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Tyler Brienza v. City of Peachtree City, Georgia, et al
as 21-12290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYLER L. BRIENZA
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PEACHTREE CITY, GEORGIA, ADAM C. WADSWORTH and MARK A. WILLIAMS
Randy Garvich v. State of Georgia, et al
as 21-10679
Defendant / Appellee:
FAYETTE COUNTY, JASON B, THOMPSON, CLAY COLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY GARVICH
Pearson v. Mobley et al
as 3:2021cv00012
Plaintiff:
Terri Pearson
Defendant:
Justin Mobley, Janet Moon, City of Peachtree City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garvich v. State of Georgia et al
as 3:2020cv00122
Defendant:
City of Peachtree City, Deputy Sheriff Kevin Zaj, Fayette County and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Curtis Garvich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brienza v. City of Peachtree City, Georgia et al
as 3:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Tyler L. Brienza
Defendant:
City of Peachtree City, Georgia, Adam C. Wadsworth and Mark A. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
John Mrosek, et al v. City of Peachtree City, et al
as 15-10289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN W. MROSEK and LEE M. MROSEK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PEACHTREE CITY, DON HADDIX, GEORGE DIENHART, Individually and as Member of the Peachtree City Council and others
John Mrosek, et al v. City of Peachtree City, et al
as 13-11394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN W. MROSEK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PEACHTREE CITY, DON HADDIX, GEORGE DIENHART, individually and as member of the Peachtree City Council and others
Mrosek et al v. City of Peachtree City et al
as 3:2012cv00094
Plaintiff:
John W. Mrosek and Lee M. Mrosek
Defendant:
City of Peachtree City , Don Haddix , George Dienhart and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
