Cases 1 - 10 of 29
O'REILLY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2023cv05188
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH O'REILLY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
FAYAD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
MARYBELLE FAYAD
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
In re: Larry Carter, et al v. City of Philadelphia
as 22-1255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
In re: Larry Carter, et al v. City of Philadelphia
as 22-1236
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARRY CARTER
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
AFSCME DISTRICT COUNCIL 33, LOCAL 427 et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv01553
Plaintiff:
AFSCME DISTRICT COUNCIL 33, LOCAL 427, KASHIF CAMPBELL, PRESIDENT CHARLES CARRINGTON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JACQUELINE DUNN, MAYOR JAMES KENNEY and others
OREILLY et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2021cv00313
Plaintiff:
JOHN SNYDER, JOSEPH OREILLY, PAUL SULOCK and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DIORIO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv06211
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and KATELYN COUGHLIN
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A DIORIO, JR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BUHLER et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2020cv04911
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BUHLER, AMANDA WINTER, TIFFANY HAWKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ADESHIGBIN v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2019cv06079
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
ADRIANE ADESHIGBIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
AFSCME LOCAL 2186 et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv05287
Plaintiff:
AFSCME LOCAL 2186, AFSCME LOCAL 159, AFSCME LOCAL 2187 and others
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN DUNBAR, ROB DUBOW, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
