Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Agee v. Reno Police Department, et al.
as 26-7363
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HICKS, BRUNSON, Reno Police Officer, THORNTON and others
Plaintiff:
KEENEN R. AGEE
Church v. Breslow, et al.
as 26-7154
Defendant:
CITY OF RENO, NEVADA SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, WASHOE COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER and others
Plaintiff:
CAMERON DOYLE CHURCH
Miranda et al v. City of Reno and Township et al
as 3:2026cv00779
Plaintiff:
Marvin J. Miranda, C.M., Yorlin Talavera and others
Defendant:
City of Reno and Township, Corey Salferino, Autrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prendergast v. Tone, et al.
as 26-5965
Plaintiff:
KALLI PRENDERGAST
Defendant:
SHELLY L. TONE, CITY OF RENO, COUNTY OF WASHOE and others
Prendergast v. City of Reno, et al.
as 26-5968
Plaintiff:
KALLI PRENDERGAST
Defendant:
CITY OF RENO, ERIC HAGUE, SHELLY L. TONE and others
Smith Jr. v. Reno City et al
as 3:2026cv00666
Plaintiff:
Robert Lonnell Smith Jr.
Defendant:
Reno Municipal Court, Benjamin Rhodes, Kathryn Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victor Camargo Juarez v. McDonald's of Keystone Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv00628
Plaintiff:
Victor Camargo Juarez
Defendant:
McDonald's of Keystone Inc., McDonald's Humason Inc., Diana Parrets and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shawn Edward Rouse v. City of Reno, et al
as 3:2026cv00619
Plaintiff:
Shawn Edward Rouse
Defendant:
City of Reno, Burda, Karl Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rouse v. City of Reno et al
as 3:2026cv00624
Plaintiff:
Shawn Edward Rouse
Defendant:
City of Reno, Burda, Karl Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrew Asuit II v. Steven Welin et al
as 3:2026cv00447
Plaintiff:
Andrew Asuit II
Defendant:
Steven Welin and City of Reno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
