Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Echols v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2026cv02396
Plaintiff:
Marques Echols
Defendant:
City of Seattle, Community House Mental Health Agency, Public Storage (PSA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chang v. Saunders, et al.
as 26-4301
Plaintiff:
VICKI CHANG, and minor J. C.
Defendant:
CHARLES SAUNDERS, MIHAELA SAUNDERS, KIM CORNELL and others
Karda v. Seattle Police Department et al
as 2:2026cv02286
Plaintiff:
George Paul Karda
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department, Lincoln Towing, Roadone Towing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Johnson v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2026cv02142
Plaintiff:
Ingrid C Johnson
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Apple Inc, OPENAI LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
JOHNSON v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2026cv03890
Plaintiff:
INGRID C. JOHNSON
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, APPLE INC., OPENAI LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Benshoof, et al. v. Admon, et al.
as 26-3113
Plaintiff:
KURT BENSHOOF and BRIANA GAGE
Defendant:
MOSHE ADMON, DANIEL AUDERER, JUSTIN BOOKER and others
Comstock v. Microsoft Corporation et al.
as 3:2026cv01266
Plaintiff:
Carolynn Comstock
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Misaka Network, Inc., Yahoo Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Onuoha v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2026cv01434
Plaintiff:
Anthony Onuoha
Defendant:
City of Seattle, Seattle Police Department, Dominic Trainor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
