Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv04919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
KARTERON v. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
BIANCA MADELANE KARTERON
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, EEOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv20008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv18789
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv15100
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
NEUROSURGICAL & MUSCULOSKELETAL ASSOCIATES et al v. SOUTH JERSEY CK LEASING, LLC
as 1:2010cv04033
Plaintiff:
NEUROSURGICAL & MUSCULOSKELETAL ASSOCIATES , LARRY S. DEUTSCH, M.D. , SCOTT JARMAIN, M.D. and others
Defendant:
SOUTH JERSEY CK LEASING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
CKS MERCANTINI ELECTRIC v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 269
as 3:2008cv05434
Plaintiff:
CKS MERCANTINI ELECTRIC
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 269
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LIFESTYLE LIFT HOLDING, INC. v. CM et al
as 1:2006cv04955
Plaintiff:
LIFESTYLE LIFT HOLDING, INC.
Defendant:
CM, ES, ED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
