Cases 21 - 30 of 99
Walker v. Genocea Biosciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv12474
Plaintiff:
Taylor Walker , Barry Heaney , Mark Haness and others
Defendant:
Genocea Biosciences, Inc. , William D. Clark and Jonathan Poole
Movant:
Omer Yuksel , Lirio Fiocchi , Scott C. Hartmann and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Heaney v. Genocea Biosciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv12168
Plaintiff:
Barry Heaney
Defendant:
Genocea Biosciences, Inc. , William D Clark and Jonathan Poole
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Emerson v. Genocea Biosciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv12137
Plaintiff:
Steven Emerson
Defendant:
Genocea Biosciences, Inc. , William D Clark and Jonathan Poole
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bushansky v. Carlucci et al
as 1:2017cv12091
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Joseph A. Carlucci, Syed T. Kamal, Michael E. Boxer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Varsity Wireless Investors, LLC v. Town of Hamilton et al
as 1:2017cv11826
Defendant:
Town of Hamilton, Bill Olson, Town of Hamilton Planning Board and others
Plaintiff:
Varsity Wireless Investors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Farmers Edge, Inc., Farmers Edge (US) Inc., and Farmers Edge (US) LLC v. Farmobile, LLC, Jason G. Tatge, Heath Garrett Gerlock, and Randall Thomas Nuss
as 1:2017mc91220
Plaintiff:
Farmers Edge, Inc., Farmers Edge (US) Inc., and Farmers Edge (US) LLC and ThoughtSynth, LLC, Martin Bures, and Eric Brown
Defendant:
Farmobile, LLC, Jason G. Tatge, Heath Garrett Gerlock, and Randall Thomas Nuss
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Clark Gerlock
Barry v. Clarke
as 17-1588
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY J. BARRY
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commissioner, Massachusetts Dept of Correction
Barry v. Clarke
as 17-1459
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY J. BARRY
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Correction
Clark v. Checkr, Inc.
as 1:2016cv12649
Defendant:
Checkr, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clark and Christopher Lee Clark
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
