Cases 41 - 50 of 91
CLARK v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00304
Petitioner:
TONY CLARK
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
ALLEN et al v. USA
as 1:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
IRIS E. ALLEN , KEVIN K BAILEY , CAROL L BENSON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
CLARK v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00061
Petitioner:
RICHARD CLARK
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
KIMBERLY-CLARK V FIRST QUALITY
as 11-1157
Defendant-Appellee:
First Quality Baby Products, LLC, First Quality Hygienic, Inc., First Quality Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.
CLARK v. USA
as 1:2011cv00010
Plaintiff:
JAMES HEDMAN CLARK
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
CLARK et al v. USA
as 1:2010cv00761
Plaintiff:
ANDREW J. CLARK , DARIEN D. SHELTON and TINA M. VEGA
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
CLARK V US
as 11-5003
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Carol Risser, James P. Davern, Jane Does 1-3 and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States, United States, United States and others
IN RE KIMBERLY-CLARK
as 10-M958
Respondent:
First Quality Baby Products, LLC, First Quality Hygienic, Inc., First Quality Products, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc., Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc., Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. and others
IN RE CLARK
as 10-1456
Appellee:
David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and others
Appellant:
James Hoyt Clark, James Hoyt Clark, James Hoyt Clark and others
CLARKE V US
as 10-5133
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Anthony G. Clarke, Anthony G. Clarke, Anthony G. Clarke and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States, United States, United States and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.