Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hedstrom v. Peters
as 1:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Keldah Elizabeth Hedstrom
Defendant:
Cody Clay Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. et al v. Not Afraid et al
as 1:2019cv00010
Defendant:
Rudolph Knute Old Crow, Shawn Back Bone, Crow Tribe of Indians and others
Plaintiff:
First Interstate Bank and First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LL's Magnetic Clay, Inc. v. Stahlberg Taylor & Associates PC
as 9:2018mc00010
Petitioner:
LL's Magnetic Clay, Inc.
Respondent:
Stahlberg Taylor & Associates PC
Intervenor Defendant:
Safer Medical of Montana, Inc.
Safer Medical of Montana v. LL's Magnetic Clay
as 4:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Safer Medical of Montana
Defendant:
LL's Magnetic Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. USA
as 2:2016cv00028
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Clay Allen Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wilson v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2015cv00110
Petitioner:
Ray Dean Wilson
Respondent:
State of Montana, County Attorney, Second Judicial Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crow Allottees Association et al v. United States Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 1:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Crow Allottees Association , Rosalla Bear Don't Walk , Sharon Bear Don't Walk and others
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Indian Affairs, United States Department of the Interior and Sally Jewell
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Preston v. USA
as 4:2008cv00061
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Clay Preston
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
