Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Jemison v. McMillen et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Dennis Elijah Jemison
Defendant:
Rodney McMillen, Kroger Company and Clay Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burton et al v. Winn et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Logan Burton, Marc Zdrojewski, James Wright and others
Defendant:
Cody Clay Winn, Market Modern, LLC and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Clay v. Gateway Financial Solutions
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Kevin Clay
Defendant:
Gateway Financial Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Krebs v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03743
Plaintiff:
Clay Krebs
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clay v. CareSource
as 1:2023cv01868
Plaintiff:
Deidra Clay
Defendant:
CareSource
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thomas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02706
Plaintiff:
Clay Thomas
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jordan v. Carter et al
as 1:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Terrell D. Jordan and Tracy D. Halsell
Defendant:
Shawn Jay Z Carter, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Parkwood Entertainment LLC and others
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Golden v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02194
Plaintiff:
Clay D Golden
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jemison v. McMullen et al
as 1:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Dennis E. Jemison
Defendant:
Rodney McMullen and Clay Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
