Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Air Alliance Houston, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1118
Petitioner:
Air Alliance Houston, Clean Air Council and Environmental Integrity Project
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Westmoreland Mining Holdings L v. EPA, et al
as 19-1176
Petitioner:
Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
Intervenor:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Center for Biological Diversity, City of Boulder and others
CLEAN AIR COUNCIL et al v. REGAN
as 1:2023cv02672
Plaintiff:
CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT and CITIZENS FOR PENNSYLVANIAS FUTURE
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner:
State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified:
ConservAmerica
Concerned Household Electricity Consumer's Council, et al v. EPA
as 22-1139
Petitioner:
Concerned Household Electricity Consumer's Council, Joseph S. D'Aleo, Clement Dwyer, Jr. and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Appalachian Mountain Club and others
Amicus Curiae:
William Happer, Christopher Field, Richard S. Lindzen and others
Westmoreland Mining Holdings v. EPA
as 20-1160
Petitioner:
Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
Sierra Club, Conservation Law Foundation, Montana Environmental Information Center and others
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
Oak Grove Management Company v. EPA, et al
as 16-1206
Petitioner:
Oak Grove Management Company, LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Calpine Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cato Institute, Joel D. Blum, Celia Y. Chen and others
Murray Energy Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 16-1127
Intervenor:
American Public Health Association, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, State of California and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Andrew Wheeler, Gina McCarthy and others
Amicus Curiae:
Robert P. Mason, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, Joel D. Blum and others
Petitioner:
Murray Energy Corporation
Southern Company Services, Inc, et al v. EPA
as 16-1208
Petitioner:
Southern Company Services, Inc., Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Calpine Corporation and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cato Institute, Joel D. Blum, Celia Y. Chen and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
