Cases 1 - 10 of 33
CLEMENT v. GARLAND
as 1:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA CLEMENT and HH EMPRESS QUEEN CHRISTINA LOCS IS OUR ARTIFACT OF FAITH
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
CLEMENT v. WASHINGTON POST
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
AUDREY CLEMENT
Defendant:
WASHINGTON POST
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GASTONG v. SULLIVAN et al
as 1:2022cv01637
Plaintiff:
HARRELL ANTHONY GASTONG, IV
Defendant:
SULLIVAN M., PAGE M., KABAH M. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RICHARD L. BUTLER, JR. v. ALL AFRICAN IMMIGRANTS et al
as 1:2021cv02187
In Re:
RICHARD L. BUTLER, JR.
Defendant:
ALL AFRICAN IMMIGRANTS, CLEMENT A. OBENG and MONISOLA MUSTAPHA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRINGER v. DOWNY et al
as 1:2021cv02042
Plaintiff:
CHARLES L. STRINGER
Defendant:
JOHN DOWNY, CARL BABIER, JIM HOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Z. B. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv03442
Plaintiff:
H. C., G. S., WENDY ADLER and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF THE STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
STRINGER v. DOWNY et al
as 1:2020cv01898
Defendant:
CARL STEWTART, LINDA ANDERSON, JIM HOOD and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES L. STRINGER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
CLEMENTE v. FBI, D.C. et al
as 1:2020cv01527
Defendant:
FBI, D.C., JOHN DOE AGENCY 1 THROUGH JOHN DOE AGENCY 10, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Not Classified By Court:
JAMES H. LESAR
Plaintiff:
ANGELA CLEMENTE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv01507
Plaintiff:
ANGELA CLEMENTE and NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
