Cases
In re: Charles Al-Pine
as 19-1318
Respondent: CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner: In re: CHARLES AL-PINE
In re: William White We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1722
Petitioner: In re: WILLIAM A. WHITE
Respondent: CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Gennaro Rauso We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1086
Defendant - Petitioner: In re: GENNARO RAUSO
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: MICHAEL M. BAYLSON and CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jason Parker v. Sam Haaz, et al
as 15-3265
Plaintiff - Appellant: JASON PARKER
Defendant - Appellee: SAM HAAZ, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY, DAVID C. SHUTER, JUDGE, PERRY DEMARCO and others
In re: Alexander Brown
as 15-2008
Petitioner: In re: ALEXANDER BROWN
Respondent: JOEL H. SLOMSKY and CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
In Re: Gennaro Rauso We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1356
Defendant - Petitioner: In re: GENNARO RAUSO
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
In re: Angel David Vargas, et al
as 14-1709
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: ANGEL DAVID VARGAS
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT CRESSON SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Nominal Respondent: CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TRADER v. OFFICE OF THE CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2009mc00019
Petitioner: OSSIE ROBERT TRADER
Respondent: OFFICE OF THE CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA and DEPUTY CLERK R.S.
Cause Of Action: Local Question
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?