Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lawhun et al v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jack Michael Lawhun and Heather Lawhun
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc. doing business as Clayton Homes Morgantown, WV, CHM of KY, Inc., CMH Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
White v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00264
Defendant:
Andrew Cameon, Doug Bowser, CMH Homes, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mary E. White
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Banks et al v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Sarah J. Banks and Mary M. Simmons
Defendant:
Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. , CMH Homes, Inc. , American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida and others
Counter_claimant:
Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Sarah J. Banks and Mary M. Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CMH Homes, Inc. et al v. Simmons et al
as 2:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
CMH Homes, Inc. , CMH Manufacturing, Inc. , Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mary C. Simmons and Sarah Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lahman et al v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00093
Plaintiff:
Heather Lahman and Maxwell Lahman
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc. and Giles Industries of Tazwell, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00215
Plaintiff:
Carolyn J. Smith
Defendant:
Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance Inc. and CMH Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
O'Dell v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
Daniel Robert O'Dell
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc. , Vanderbilt Mortgage & Finance, Inc. and Betty Lanham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington et al v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00008
Plaintiff:
Alonzo D. Washington and Sherry R. Washington
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc., CMH Homes, Inc., Rural Construction & Development Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
