Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Coleman v. Wolfson
as 2:2023cv01564
Plaintiff:
RaJohn Coleman
Defendant:
Steven Wolfson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00718
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Coleman et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv01511
Defendant:
Officer Ammon Peacock and Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Plaintiff:
A. C. and Delilah Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Coleman v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv00739
Plaintiff:
Solomon Coleman
Defendant:
Brian Santarossa, Joseph Lepore, Vicente Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02155
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leon et al v. Clark County School District et al
as 2:2019cv00069
Defendant:
Chris Garvey, Danielle Ford, CCSD Board of Trustees and others
Plaintiff:
Laura Leon and Alejandro Leon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boseke v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00978
Plaintiff:
Sasha Boseke
Defendant:
Solomon Coleman and Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman v. Nevada State et al
as 2:2015cv00121
Defendant:
Board of Commissioners, City Councilman Committee, Clark County Clerks and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Ann Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
