Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 5,297
Melendez v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 8:2024cv00597
Petitioner: Carlos Melendez
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Melendez v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2024cv00112
Petitioner: Carlos Melendez
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rincon-Puello v. Warden - FCC Coleman Low
as 8:2024cv00598
Petitioner: Juan Rincon-Puello
Respondent: Warden - FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marmol Vallejo v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2024cv00117
Petitioner: Fredy Donaldo Marmol Vallejo
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rincon-Puello v. Warden - FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2024cv00124
Petitioner: Juan Rincon-Puello
Respondent: Warden - FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
James Graham v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 24-10642
Petitioner: JAMES MARTIN GRAHAM
Respondent: WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW
Jorge MojocoaIn re: Jorge Mojocoa
as 24-10596
Petitioner: In re: JORGE MOJOCOA
Respondent: WARDEN, FLORIDA CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX- COLEMAN LOW
Pickens v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff: Travis Sentel Pickens
Defendant: Ms. Morgan, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidovic v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00086
Petitioner: Ronald Davidovic
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?