Cases 1 - 6 of 6
INGRAM v. SUPERINTENDENT et al
as 2:2020cv01517
Petitioner:
QUENTIN INGRAM
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RAMIREZ v. SUPT. SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS et al
as 5:2019cv01295
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, SUPT. SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS, COM OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
GENESIS MATOS RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ELANSARI v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2018cv01123
Petitioner:
Amro A Elansari
Respondent:
Com. of Pennsylvania and The Attorney General of the State of ______
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ELANSARI v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv02161
Petitioner:
AMRO ELANSARI
Respondent:
COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF _____________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cadmus v. Com. of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2016cv01718
Petitioner:
Norman Alan Cadmus
Respondent:
Com. of Pennsylvania, SCI Houtzdale and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STOKES v. COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv04054
Petitioner:
DERRICK STOKES
Respondent:
COM. OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
