Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Richard Priddis, et al v. Sony Music Publishing (US) LLCIn re: Richard Priddis, et al v. Sony Music Publishing (US) LLC
as 22-15457
Debtor:
In the Matter of: RICHARD L. PRIDDIS
Appellant:
SONY MUSIC PUBLISHING (US) LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FKA Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC, COLGEMS-EMI MUSIC, INC., a Delaware corporation, COMBINE MUSIC CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and others
Appellee:
RICHARD L. PRIDDIS
Sony/ATV Publishing, LLC, et al v. Gai Marcos, et al
as 16-6407
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SONY/ATV PUBLISHING, LLC, A Delaware Limited Liability Company, SONY/ATV TUNES, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, dba Sony/ATV Cross Keys Publishing, dba Sony/ATV Milene Music Publishing, dba Sony/ATV Allegro Music Publishing, dba Sony/ATV Accent Music Publishing, dba Sony/ATV Accorde Music Publishing, dba So, SONY/ATV SONGS LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, dba Sony/ATV Tree Publishing, dba Sony/ATV Acuff Rose Music Publishing, dba Sony/ATV Ballad Music Publishing, dba Sony/ATV Contryside Music Publishing, dba Sony/ATV Bailar Music Publishing, dba Son and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GAI MARCOS, Individually and 1729172 ONTARIO, INC., a Canadian corporation, dba Tricerasoft.com, dba Selectkaraoke.com, dba Karaokedownloads.ca
Defendant:
JAMES GERALD WOODFORD, et al
Broadcast Music Incorporated et al v. Kukui Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv00497
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music Incorporated , Interior Music Corporation , EMI Blackwood Music Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Kukui Incorporated, Carmen Tolentino and Alvin Medgin
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Bandera Cowboy Bar, LLC et al
as 5:2009cv00882
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Broadcast Music, Inc., George Thorogood and others
Defendant:
Bandera Cowboy Bar, LLC and James McGroarty
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
