Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SCOTT et al v. COMMERCE BANCORP, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv04593
Plaintiff:
VALERIE SCOTT and JAMES SCOTT
Defendant:
COMMERCE BANCORP, INC., BROADSPIRE SERVICES, JOHN DOE I THROUGH JOHN DOE XVIII and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL et al v. DIFLORIO et al
as 1:2009cv03685
Plaintiff:
VERNON W. HILL, II, SHIRLEY HILL and INTERARCH, INC
Defendant:
DENNIS M. DIFLORIO, JACK R. BERSHAD, DONALD T. DIFRANCESCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GARVEY v. COMMERCE BANCORP, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03475
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH GARVEY
Defendant:
COMMERCE BANCORP, INC., COMMERCE BANC INSURANCE SERVICES, TD BANK FINANCIAL GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MANN et al v. T.D. BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2009cv01062
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MANN and ANGELO CAPIZZI
Defendant:
T.D. BANK, N.A., TORONTO-DOMINION BANK, COMMERCE BANCORP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT et al v. COMMERCE BANCORP, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv05905
Plaintiff:
POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF DETROIT and LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant:
COMMERCE BANCORP, INC., DENNIS M. DIFLORIO, ROBERT D. FALESE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
SHEETMETAL WORKERS' NATIONAL PENSION FUND v. HILL et al
as 1:2007cv02269
Plaintiff:
SHEETMETAL WORKERS' NATIONAL PENSION FUND
Defendant:
VERNON W. HILL, II, JACK R. BERSHAD, JOSEPH E. BUCKELEW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
LUCAS v. HILL et al
as 1:2007cv00349
Plaintiff:
PEARL E. LUCAS and PEARL E. LUCAS
Defendant:
VERNON W. HILL, II, COMMERCE BANCORP, INC. and COMMERCE BANCORP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
