Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Arroyo v. Commonwealth of Massachusett
as 12-2302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY ARROYO
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
United States of America et al v. Regional Home Care, Inc.
as 1:2012cv11979
Plaintiff:
United States of America , The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, John Doe 1 and others
Defendant:
Regional Home Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America et al v. Forest Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv11354
Plaintiff:
United States of America , Commonwealth of Massachusetts , Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
Forest Laboratories, Inc. and Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Ateek v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2011cv11566
Plaintiff:
Michael Ateek
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America ex rel Julio Escobar et al v. Universal Health Services, Inc.
as 1:2011cv11170
Plaintiff:
United States of America , Carmen Correa , Julio Escobar and others
Defendant:
Universal Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Cohen v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv12053
Plaintiff:
Jillian M Cohen
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation , Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of Edward Caldwell et al v. Hillsborough County et al
as 1:2008cv10931
Plaintiff:
Estate of Edward Caldwell and Dibbie Caldwell
Defendant:
Hillsborough County, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Autopro & Consultant Services et al v. Travelers Indemnity Company et al
as 1:2007cv10782
Plaintiff:
Autopro & Consultant Services and Alphonse R. Ferent, Jr.
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company, Daniel Sorgie, Anne Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
