Cases 61 - 70 of 340
ARDANEH v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2019cv01786
Defendant:
BONNIE FRIEDMAN, HEATHER STROUD, ABDULLAH ALJOBORI and others
Plaintiff:
HAMID REZA ARDANEH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liviz v. Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2019cv11289
Respondent:
Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Petitioner:
Ilya Liviz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ardaneh v. Babai et al
as 1:2019cv11228
Defendant:
Bonnie Friedman, Heather Stroud, Abdullah Aljobori and others
Plaintiff:
Hamid Reza Ardaneh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morin v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
as 3:2019cv30075
Petitioner:
Jeremy Morin
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evariste v. Bristol County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2019cv10671
Defendant:
Bristol County Sheriff's Office, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and Officer Velez
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Evariste
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morin v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 3:2019cv30043
Petitioner:
Jeremy Morin
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Liviz Sr. v. Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2019cv10393
Defendant:
Honorable Justice Scott L. Kafker, Honorable Justice Frank M. Gaziano, Honoralbe Justice Elspeth B. Cypher and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist Ilya Liviz Sr. and Baby Jurist Ilyan Liviz Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fox v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 3:2019cv10095
Petitioner:
Aaron M Fox
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fox v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 3:2019cv10095
Petitioner:
Aaron M Fox
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garrett v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2019cv10060
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Plaintiff:
Raheem Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
