Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
KRAEMER v. FONTNO et al
as 5:2015cv05874
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KRAEMER
Defendant:
AMY FONTNO, LEHIGH TRANSITION SERVICES, JOHN MERLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KRAEMER v. FONTNO et al
as 2:2015cv05874
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KRAEMER
Defendant:
AMY FONTNO, LEHIGH TRANSITION SERVICES, JOHN MERLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KRAEMER v. FONTNO et al
as 5:2015cv01521
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KRAEMER
Defendant:
AMY (DERAYMOND) FONTNO, LISA SPITALE, SHANNON MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TOMLIN et al v. PEASE et al
as 2:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
CONSTANCE M. TOMLIN
Defendant:
MAE M. PEASE, PA-C , SUSAN GLENNON, M.D. , COOKE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER and others
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cross_claimant:
SUSAN GLENNON, M.D. , BRAVO HEALTH ADVANCED CARE CENTER , JAMES C. KING, III, M.D. and others
Cross_defendant:
COOKE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER , LEILA S. HARDWARE, D.O. , JAMES C. KING, III, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv04469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
