Cases 1 - 10 of 50
TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED v. AMPPRAGMATICPLAY.COM et al
as 1:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED
Defendant:
AMPPRAGMATICPLAY.COM, ASIA-PRAGMATICPLAY.COM, CHEATPRAGMATICPLAY.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED v. PPGAMESUSA.COM et al
as 1:2023cv01692
Plaintiff:
TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED
Defendant:
PPGAMESUSA.COM, PRAGMATICPLAYGAMING.COM, ASIAPRAGMATICPLAY.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
BlackRock, Inc. v. 3BLACKROCK.COM et al
as 1:2023cv01375
Plaintiff:
BlackRock, Inc.
Defendant:
3BLACKROCK.COM, ALADDIN-BLACKROCK.COM, ALADDINLENDING.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
Weddington v. National Indemnity Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Weddington
Defendant:
National Indemnity Insurance Company and Central Xpress, LLC
Consolidated Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
PragmaticPlay International Ltd. v. AGEN-PRAGMATICPLAY.ORG et al
as 1:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
PragmaticPlay International Ltd.
Defendant:
AGEN-PRAGMATICPLAY.ORG, BOCORANPRAGMATICPLAY.COM, DAFTARPRAGMATICPLAY.ORG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
PragmaticPlay International Ltd. v.51ppgame.com et al
as 1:2022cv01016
Plaintiff:
PragmaticPlay International Ltd.
Defendant:
51ppgame.com, 9-ppgames.com, Ag-ppgames.net and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
PragmaticPlay International Ltd. v. 789PRAGMATICPLAY.COM et al
as 1:2022cv00835
Plaintiff:
PragmaticPlay International Ltd.
Defendant:
789PRAGMATICPLAY.COM, 88PRAGMATICPLAY.COM, AGENPRAGMATICPLAY.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
Wang v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv00651
Plaintiff:
Shuiying Wang
Defendant:
Doe John, 016.com, 100700.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
Yap v John Doe et al
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Vincent Yap
Defendant:
284.com, 717.com, 1588.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
Zeng et al v. DOE et al
as 1:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Xinming Zeng and Zaiyan Wang
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and 699.com
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
