Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00929
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Con-Way Freight Inc. v. USDC-CASF
as 13-71160
:
In re: CON-WAY FREIGHT INC.
Petitioner:
CON-WAY FREIGHT INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
JORGE R. QUEZADA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
St Charles Trading Inc v. S C Enterprises Corporation
as 2:2013cv02051
Counter Defendant:
Con-Way Freight Inc, Does and St Charles Trading Inc
Counter Claimant:
S C Enterprises Corporation
Defendant:
S C Enterprises Corporation
Plaintiff:
St Charles Trading Inc
George Avila v. Con-Way Freight Inc.
as 12-55997
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEORGE A. AVILA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
CON-WAY FREIGHT INC., a Delaware Corporation
Bedwell v. Con-Way Freight, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00291
618) 465-2318 (fax:
Robert A. Bedwell
Defendant:
Con-Way Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
George Avila v. Con-Way Freight Inc.
as 12-80122
Plaintiff - Respondent:
GEORGE A. AVILA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Petitioner:
CON-WAY FREIGHT INC., a Delaware Corporation
George A Avila v. Con-Way Freight Inc et al
as 8:2011cv01949
Plaintiff:
George A Avila
Defendant:
Con-Way Freight Inc and Does
Kelvin Lacey v. Con-Way Freight Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02287
Defendant:
Con-Way Freight Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Lacey
Con-Way Freight, Inc. v. Mikohn Signs and Graphics, LLC
as 2:2010cv01188
Plaintiff:
Con-Way Freight, Inc.
Defendant:
Mikohn Signs and Graphics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
