Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Manley v. Babich et al
as 3:2023cv03982
Plaintiff:
Douglas L. Manley
Defendant:
Dr Babich, Rachell Dodd, Mr. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conn v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq03641
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Debra Conn
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Manley v. Conn et al
as 3:2023cv03146
Plaintiff:
Douglas L. Manley
Defendant:
Daniel Conn, Wexford Health Sources Inc., Jay Robert Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Exum v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv01994
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. Exum, Jr.
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Mitchell, Percy Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Ziogas v. Conn et al
as 3:2023cv00756
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Ziogas
Defendant:
Daniel Conn, Cheri Laurent, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv02569
Plaintiff:
Joshua L. McCall, Sr.
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Mitchell, Daniel L. Conn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
