Cases 31 - 40 of 3,308
Stephenson v. Davis
as 24-414
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STEPHENSON, (Class of One, Pro-se Petitioner)
Defendant:
CARLENE DAVIS, (D.O.C. Counselor Supervisor), ANGEL QUIROS, (Commissioner-Conn. Dept of Correction, BARONE, (Warden, MacDougall State Prison) and others
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Adam Cook LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Adam Cook LLC d/b/a Three Sheets Bar & Grill and Adam M. Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cook v. Galaza
as 24-630
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAMON BALAR COOK
Respondent / Appellee:
GEORGE M. GALAZA, Warden
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-270
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant / Appellee:
Captain TOLMIE, BLEKIS, PELLITERI and others
Defendant:
ROLLIN COOK, WILLIAM MULLIGAN, AMONDA HANNAH and others
Montford v. Pryor, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv20403
Plaintiff:
John Montford
Defendant:
William H Pryor, Jr., Lanier Anderson, III, Gerald Tjoflat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Montford v. Pryor, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv20381
Plaintiff:
John Montford
Defendant:
William H. Pryor, Jr., Lanier Anderson, III, Gerald Tjoflat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Montford v. Pryor, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv20371
Plaintiff:
John Montford
Defendant:
William H. Pryor, Jr., Lanier Anderson, III, Gerald Tjoflat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Cook v. Mount Vernon Police Department
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Monica Lynne Cook
Defendant:
Mt Vernon Police Department and Mount Vernon Police Department
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cook v. Washington State Department of Children Youth and Families et al
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Monica Lynne Cook
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Children Youth and Families, Sarah Potter, Sarah OConner and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
