Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Williams, Corey v. United States Of America
as 0:2024cv60398
Plaintiff:
Corey Williams
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
FOUAD v. WILLIAMS et al
as 0:2024cv60247
Plaintiff:
OMAR MOHSEN IBRAHIM FOUAD
Defendant:
NASHAN WILLIAMS, VINCENT CORNELIUS, COREY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Berry v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv24416
Plaintiff:
Corey Duran Berry
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62136
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Northcutt v. Single Grain LLC et al
as 1:2023cv24168
Counter Defendant:
Corey E Northcutt
Counter Claimant:
Single Grain LLC
Defendant:
Capchase Inc and Eric Siu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sayed v. Horta
as 1:2023cv24012
Plaintiff:
Estate of Corey Stanley and Mattie P. Sayed
Defendant:
Leamsi Horta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hebron v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 9:2023cv81295
Plaintiff:
Corey Mykel Hebron
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, Katherine Rundle Fernandez, Kimberly Riviera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Hebron v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 9:2023cv81296
Plaintiff:
Corey Mykel Hebron
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Ramsey et al
as 4:2023cv10038
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Lamar Roberts
Defendant:
Sheriff Rick Ramsey and Detective Matthew Corey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
