Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jenkins v. Carney
as 24-1370
Plaintiff:
DEBRA LYNN JENKINS
Defendant:
CORMAC J. CARNEY, DISTRICT JUDGE
Simona Tanasescu et al v. The United States et al
as 2:2024cv01378
Plaintiff:
Simona Tanasescu
Defendant:
The United States, U.S. Department of Justice, Judicial Council of the U.S. Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Debra Jenkins v. Cormac J. Carney
as 2:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Debra Lynn Jenkins
Defendant:
Judge Cormac J. Carney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanh Thi My Do v. Cormac J Carney et al
as 8:2021cv01756
Plaintiff:
Hanh Thi My Do
Defendant:
Cormac J Carney, James V Senal, F McCormick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abanoob Abdel-Malak, et al v. USA, et al
as 20-55615
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, Unknown Defendants et al, MICHAEL GASSNER, MARIO RIVAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABANOOB ABDEL-MALAK
Plaintiff:
SINAI ACQUISITIONS, LLC, a limited liability company
Abanoob Abdel-Malak et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv04783
Defendant:
Wendy Harris, Kenyl Kiya Kato, Superior Court of California County of San Bernardiono, Riverside, San Diego, Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Abanoob Abdel-Malak and Sinai Acquisitions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Carl Gowdy v. Lindley R. Heher et al
as 2:2018cv07898
Defendant:
Susan S. Kim, Lia Martin, William N. Sterling and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Gowdy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alber Said v. Judge Cormac J Carney et al
as 5:2015cv01081
Respondent:
Judge Cormac J Carney and Judge Cormac J Carney
Petitioner:
Alber Said
Daniel Dydzak v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye, et al
as 12-56960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, JOYCE L. KENNARD, MARVIN R. BAXTER and others
Daniel David Dydzak v. Cantil-Sakauye et al
as 2:2011cv05560
Defendant:
Judge Percy Anderson, Marvin R Baxter, California Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Dydzak
Movant:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
