Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Legal Real Estate, LLC et al v. Macomb
as 2:2024cv10278
Plaintiff:
Legal Real Estate, LLC and Madilyn Greiner
Defendant:
The County Of Macomb and Macomb, County of
Interested Party:
Thomas A Fox
Barksdale v. County of Macomb et al
as 4:2021cv12729
Plaintiff:
Shantanice Barksdale
Defendant:
County of Macomb, Michael Gorges, Amanda Backers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv13303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Womble v. County of Macomb et al
as 3:2020cv11494
Defendant:
Anthony Wickersham, County of Macomb, Carly Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Alonzo L Womble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Michigan State Police et al
as 2:2019cv13082
Defendant:
County of Macomb, Michigan State Police, Judge Kathleen M. McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Duanne Tyrone Barber
Herriges v. County of Macomb et al
as 2:2019cv12193
Defendant:
Dr. Lawrence Sherman, County of Macomb, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Carol Herriges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv11781
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Russell Hubble v. County of Macomb, et al
as 19-1599
Defendant:
JANE/JOHN DOE, Providers
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHANIE NOLAND, CHANTALLE BROCK, LAWRENCE SHERMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL HUBBLE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jennifer Lynn Meyers, Deceased
Davis v. County of Macomb et al
as 1:2018cv13184
Defendant:
Justin Locke, Unknown Officers and County of Macomb
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flowers v. County of Macomb et al
as 2:2018cv11248
Plaintiff:
Dequan Flowers
Defendant:
County of Macomb , Brandon Medlow , James Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
