Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gupta v. Brainard, et al.
as 26-3180
Plaintiff:
SUSHANT GUPTA, an individual
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER M. BRAINARD, individually and in his capacity as attorney and real estate broker, LEE ANN DISALVO, individually and as agent for dissolved entity, INTUITIVE HEALING INSTITUTE, LLC, dissolved California limited liability company and others
Lopez v. County of Orange, et al.
as 26-3151
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LOPEZ
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, ANDREW DO, FRANK KIM and others
Lopez v. County of Orange, et al.
as 26-2724
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LOPEZ
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, FRANK KIM, Individual, CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT, Government Entity and others
Derakhshani Jan v. County of Orange, et al.
as 26-2503
Defendant:
BILAL A. ESSAYLI, COUNTY OF ORANGE, DONALD BARNES and others
Plaintiff:
SANAZ DERAKHSHANI JAN
Ryan Sinclair v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2026cv00938
Plaintiff:
Ryan Sinclair
Defendant:
County of Orange, Deputy Jerell Bosley, Deputy Jerrell Bosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benson v. Linville, et al.
as 26-2321
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALLEN BENSON
Defendant:
CRAIG LINVILLE, as CHP Officer, KYLE ANKNEY, COUNTY OF ORANGE and others
Pulido et al v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2026cv00891
Plaintiff:
Maritza Salas Pulido and Estate of Juan Vasquez Pulido
Defendant:
County of Orange and Sheriff Don Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Bryan Kaye v. Kevin Haskins et al.
as 8:2026cv00831
Plaintiff:
Bryan Kaye
Defendant:
Kevin Haskins, Doe 1, Deputy Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bendana v. Solis, et al.
as 26-2083
Plaintiff:
KAREN BENDANA
Defendant:
EILEEN M. SOLIS, Honorable, individual and official capacity, COUNTY OF ORANGE, Erroneously Sued As Orange County District Attorneys Office, TAMARA JACOBS, individual and official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
