Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Boyd v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
William S. Boyd
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Charles Cox, P. Maney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00268
Petitioner:
Tyler Cox
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Adams et al v. Bonneville Power Administration et al
as 6:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Robert Adams, Carey Anderson, Karen Anderson and others
Defendant:
Bonneville Power Administration, Eugene Water and Electric Board, Lane Electric Cooperative, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Cox v. Cox
as 6:2023cv01744
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Cox
Defendant:
Cassondra Nichole Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Reyes et al
as 2:2023cv01284
Plaintiff:
William S. Boyd
Defendant:
Erin Reyes, Warren Roberts, Charles Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Wallace v. Nooth et al
as 2:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Adam Wallace
Defendant:
Mark Nooth, David Pedro, Lemens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Corrections, DSG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2022cv01356
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cox
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
