Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Matchette et al v. CR Bard Inc
as 1:2012cv00287
Plaintiff: Molly Dale Matchette and Kevin Dale Matchette
Defendant: CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Karlson et al v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00230
Plaintiff: Jodi Karlson and Robert Karlson
Defendant: CR Bard Inc , Covidien Inc, Covidien PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berggren et al v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00048
Plaintiff: Patricia Berggren , Denice Greiner , Shawn Klosterman and others
Defendant: CR Bard Inc , Covidien Inc, Covidien PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fax et al v. CR Bard Inc
as 2:2011cv01107
Plaintiff: Cheryl Fax and Donald Fax
Defendant: CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CAYWOOD v. ANONYMOUS HOSPITAL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01313
Defendant: ANONYMOUS HOSPITAL and CR BARD, INC.
Plaintiff: PATRICIA CAYWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Linder v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00896
Plaintiff: Robyn Linder and Robyn Linder
Defendant: Davol Inc and CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sandberg v. Davol, Inc et al
as 4:2009cv04060
Plaintiff: Susanna G Sandberg
Defendant: Davol, Inc and CR Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
King et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00328
Plaintiff: Malinda King, Malinda King, Terry King and others
Defendant: Davol Inc and CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Miller et al v. Bard Brachytherapy Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00038
Plaintiff: Donald Miller and Charlotte Miller
Defendant: Bard Brachytherapy Inc, Bard Urological Division, Anazao Health Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?