Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Lora et al v. Baylor et al
as 1:2020cv01787
Plaintiff:
Justin Coate, Howard Wolfe, Jhon Lora and others
Defendant:
Lt. Baylor, George Warden, Mr. Armond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alford v. Hodle et al
as 1:2020cv01427
Defendant:
Garry Hodle, Monroe County Jail, Mail Clerk and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Alford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALFORD v. WISENHOWER et al
as 1:2017cv06259
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant:
WISENHOWER, TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY HALL OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALFORD v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2017cv06103
Petitioner:
CRAIG ALFORD
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALFORD v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2017cv05611
Petitioner:
CRAIG ALFORD
Respondent:
KAREN TAYLOR, NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALFORD v. POTTIEGER et al
as 2:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant:
MICHAEL POTTIEGER, CHARLES A. ECKERT, LEONARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALFORD v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2015cv07145
Petitioner:
CRAIG ALFORD
Respondent:
ELLIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALFORD v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2015cv06998
Petitioner:
CRAIG ALFORD
Respondent:
ELLIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALFORD et al v. WOJCHIECHOWICZ et al
as 3:2015cv06750
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant:
BO ROBINSON PSYCHOLOGIST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALFORD v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2015cv03783
Petitioner:
CRAIG ALFORD
Respondent:
CHARLES ELLIS, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
