Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Romulus et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv11734
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
David Romulus , Cassandra Beale , Nicholas Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv30226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv11473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Winkelman et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 1:2011cv11398
Plaintiff:
Myron Winkelman , Stephani Leflore , United States of America and others
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation , Caremark RX, Inc. , Caremark PCS llc and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv10482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ugwu v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv11403
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. , Bruce Kaplan , David Goyett and others
Plaintiff:
Loretta Ugwu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Stinson v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv11164
Plaintiff:
Clifford J Stinson, III
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Griffith v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv10106
Plaintiff:
Shawn Griffith
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation and Massachusetts CVS Pharmacy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Gardner v. Bayer, et al
as 1:2009cv12226
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Gardner and Carolyn Gardner
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharamaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Faherty et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 1:2009cv12102
Plaintiff:
James Faherty, linda feibel and Moe Tarkinow
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
