Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Brown v. Robert E Cahill, Jr. et al
as 1:2022cv02465
Petitioner:
Dwayne Larcel Brown
Respondent:
Robert E Cahill, Jr., Central Booking Warden, The Attorney General of the State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Watson v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Rusasene Watson
Defendant:
Gail Watts, Ms. White and Judge CaHill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02116
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02282
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stagg v. Judge Robert Cahill, Jr. et al
as 1:2021cv02185
Petitioner:
Jermaine Shaun Stagg
Respondent:
Judge Robert Cahill, Jr. and States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
White Jr. v. Amparo et al
as 1:2021cv01904
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael White Jr.
Defendant:
Stacy Amparo, Scott D. Shellenberger, Honorable Judge Robert Cahill, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hammock v. Barbera et al
as 1:2021cv01753
Plaintiff:
Terrence Edward Hammock
Defendant:
Chief Judge Mary Ellen Barbera, Judge Robert Cahill, Jr., Judge Kathleen Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Petrovia v. Watts et al
as 1:2021cv00989
Defendant:
Administrative Lieut N Zahn, Baltimore County Police Dept., Warden Gail Watts and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Petrovia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harris v. Watts et al
as 1:2021cv00896
Defendant:
Dennis M. Robinson, Capital Area Regional Fugitive Task Force, Catharine Resenblatt and others
Plaintiff:
Travon T. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00876
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
