Cases 21 - 30 of 256
Cai v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv02525
Plaintiff:
Lijin Cai
Defendant:
Secretary Alejando Mayorkas, USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou, Patricia A. Menges and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cai v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv02524
Plaintiff:
Lijin Cai
Defendant:
Secretary Alejando Mayorkas, USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou, Patricia A. Menges and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Cau Hong
as 23-50038
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CAU HONG, AKA Cay A., AKA Hong, AKA A. Cau Hong, AKA Calvin Hong, AKA Cau Kevin Hong, AKA Kevin Calvin Hong, AKA Kevin Cau Hong, AKA Kevin Cay Hong, AKA Thai Binh Hong
In Re Naturalization Ceremony 2/11/2023
as 3:2023mc80027
In Re:
In Re Naturalization Ceremony, Milan Aggarwal, Namrata Saidas Naik and others
Cai, et al. v. Garland
as 23-186
Petitioner:
NENGHUI CAI, HE SHAO QIN and XU CAO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Telecom Business Solution, LLC v. Terra Towers Corp.
as 23-144
Petitioner:
Telecom Business Solution, LLC, Latam Towers, LLC and AMLQ Holdings (Cay), Ltd.
Respondent:
Terra Towers Corp. and TBS Management, S.A.
Appellant:
DT Holdings, Inc.
Application of LM Property Development Limited and Mirko Kovats
as 0:2022cv62185
In Re:
Bahamas
Respondent:
Treasure Cay Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Application of LM Property Development Limited and Mirko Kovats
as 0:2022mc62185
In Re:
Bahamas
Respondent:
Treasure Cay Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Plumley v. Pzena Investment Management, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01337
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Defendant:
Pzena Investment Management, LLC, Richard S. Pzena, John P. Goetz and others
Huang v. Garland
as 22-6463
Petitioner:
CAI XIA HUANG
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
