Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Papso v. Service Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv03861
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Papso
Defendant:
Safeport Insurance Company and Service Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Kauff et al v. American Family Connect Insurance Agency, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Kauff and Adam Sevin
Defendant:
American Family Connect Insurance Agency, Inc. and Christian Chatman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00973
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Claiborne v. Government Employees Insurance Company, et al
as 3:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Claiborne
Not Classified By Court:
John J. Radziewicz
Defendant:
James River Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolf v. Looper et al
as 3:2020cv00793
Defendant:
John Fraiche, Roger Calvin Looper, II and Ascension Parish Sherriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. The City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2020cv00514
Defendant:
Christopher Nakamoto, Shanard Carey, East Baton Rouge Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Looper et al
as 3:2019cv00806
Defendant:
Ascension Parish Sheriff's Dept. and Roger Calvin Looper, II
Plaintiff:
Caitlin Ann Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, et al
as 3:2019cv00048
Defendant:
Pat Magee, East Baton Rouge Parish, S Carey and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blache et al v. Garda CL Southeast, Inc.
as 2:2018cv01682
Defendant:
Garda CL Southeast, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brent Blache and Caitlin Hirsch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
