Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Lane v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00405
Plaintiff:
Connie L. Lane
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heady v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Tammy Jo Heady
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maynard v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00412
Plaintiff:
Connie Christine Maynard
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steele v. Ethicon, Inc et al
as 1:2012cv00241
Plaintiff:
Linda Steele
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc, Analytic Biosurgical Solutions, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00411
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Louise Williams
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sosa v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00732
Plaintiff:
Toni K. Sosa
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meade v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
Mary F. Meade
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, Sofradim Production SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00734
Plaintiff:
Wanda Wells
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buie v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00407
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Darlene Buie
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphree v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02630
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Murphree
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
