Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Mendocino Railway v. Jack Ainsworth, et al
as 23-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MENDOCINO RAILWAY, a California corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
JACK AINSWORTH, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission and CITY OF FORT BRAGG, a California municipal corporation
City of Fort Bragg et al v. Mendocino Railway
as 4:2022cv06317
Plaintiff:
City of Fort Bragg and California Coastal Commission
Defendant:
Mendocino Railway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
California Coastal Commission v. North County Transit District et al
as 3:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
California Coastal Commission
Defendant:
North County Transit District, Does 1 through 25, Exbon Devlopment, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10101 Interstate Commerce Act-Interstate Transportation Rail
Van De Walker et al v. Widener et al
as 3:2021cv01829
Plaintiff:
John Van De Walker and Tracy Van De Walker
Defendant:
Brian K. Widener, Federal Aviation Administration, San Diego County Regional Airport Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Randy Ralston, et al v. County of San Mateo, et al
as 21-16489
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY RALSTON and LINDA MENDIOLA
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO and CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
Ralston et al v. County of San Mateo et al
as 3:2021cv01880
Defendant:
California Coastal Commission and County of San Mateo
Plaintiff:
Randy Ralston and Linda Mendiola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey S. ONeil v. California Coastal Commission
as 2:2019cv07749
Defendant:
California Coastal Commission and Santa Barbara County
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S O'Neil and Jeffrey S. ONeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Center for Bio Diversity, et al v. BOEM, et al
as 19-55728
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DAVID FISH, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, WALTER CRUICKSHANK, Acting Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and others
Plaintiff:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, SANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER, a California non-profit corporation, CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and WISHTOYO FOUNDATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
DCOR, LLC, EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION and AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
Amicus Curiae:
REP. SALUD CARBAJAL, REP. JULIA BROWNLEY, REP. JARED HUFFMAN, REP. DORIS MATSUI, REP. BARBARA LEE, REP. GRACE NAPOLITANO, REP. NANETTE BARRAGAN, REP. MATT CARTWRIGHT, and REP. STEVE COHEN
People of the State of CA, et al v. BOEM, et al
as 19-55727
Plaintiff:
WISHTOYO FOUNDATION, SANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER, a California non-profit corporation, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DAVID FISH, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, WALTER CRUICKSHANK, Acting Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Rob Bonta, Attorney General
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
DCOR, LLC, EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION and AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
Amicus Curiae:
REP. SALUD CARBAJAL, REP. JULIA BROWNLEY, REP. JARED HUFFMAN, REP. DORIS MATSUI, REP. BARBARA LEE, REP. GRACE NAPOLITANO, REP. NANETTE BARRAGAN, REP. MATT CARTWRIGHT, and REP. STEVE COHEN
EDC, et al v. BOEM, et al
as 19-55725
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WISHTOYO FOUNDATION, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, SANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER, a California non-profit corporation and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, DCOR, LLC and EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the Interior, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, BUREAU OF SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENFORCEMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
