Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0790 Rehabilitation of Labor
Simpson v. California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00164
Plaintiff:
Katie Simpson
Defendant:
California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. and Nestle USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00800
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Remigio, S. De R.L. De C.V. v. California Pizza Kitchen, Inc.
as 2:2010cv05358
Defendant:
California Pizza Kitchen, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Remigio, S. De R.L. De C.V.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01273
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
John Cooley v. California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv01932
Plaintiff:
John Cooley, John Cooley and John Cooley
Defendant:
California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
David Johnson v. California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv08113
Plaintiff:
David Johnson, David Johnson, David Johnson and others
Defendant:
California Pizza Kitchen, Inc., The California Pizza Kitchen Foundation and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
David Johnson v. California Pizza Kitchen, Inc et al
as 2:2007cv06440
Plaintiff:
David Johnson, David Johnson, David Johnson and others
Defendant:
California Pizza Kitchen, Inc, The California Pizza Kitchen Foundation and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
